|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Feb 3, 2010 15:38:25 GMT -5
I'm hesitant, but ok. I would be fine with 40 or 41, but not much higher. There's just too many ways to get around things like Bubble and Shii-Cho nowadays, you can't really ever rely on them to make a character. I agree. Shii-Cho can be overrated, but really the only ways around Bubble are Ysalamiri, Force Immunity, and Overwhelming Force, which are only found on select characters. Anyway, I think 40 is good for his cost. What do others think? Is 40 a good cost for this version of Ganner?
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Feb 4, 2010 0:49:47 GMT -5
I wasn't thinking so much of things that negate it, but that it can always be punched through. All you need is something that deals 30+ damage. But anyway, that doesn't really matter.
|
|
|
Post by saber1 on Feb 4, 2010 11:56:17 GMT -5
So, are these the stats we are looking at?
Ganner Rhysode Cost: 40 HP: 100 Def: 18 Atk: 11 Dmg: 20
Special Abilities Unique Melee Attack Twin Attack Regeneration 10 Shii-Cho Style
Force Powers Force 1, Force Renewal 1 Force Bubble Force Repulse 3 Lightsaber Sweep Lightsaber Riposte
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Feb 4, 2010 20:50:34 GMT -5
I believe they were. One more request: could we bump his force back up to 2? I really think that extra force point is necessary in order for him to be able to plausibly pull of Repulse, Sweep, and Riposte (since Bubble will probably be used often).
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Feb 5, 2010 14:29:14 GMT -5
I'm okay with him with 1 FP or 2 FP.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Feb 5, 2010 15:17:46 GMT -5
I am as well. So these are the stats we are looking at for final approval:
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Feb 5, 2010 19:54:28 GMT -5
I like him. More of a niche piece (pretty much designed for mass melee combat), but effective at what he does. Thumbs up here!
|
|
|
Post by saber1 on Feb 5, 2010 21:04:29 GMT -5
Not quite what I was hoping for, but a solid piece. I'll sign off on it.
|
|
|
Post by Dendrite on Feb 6, 2010 0:47:30 GMT -5
Approved ;D
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Feb 6, 2010 10:26:21 GMT -5
It has my approval as well. (If that wasn't already assumed )
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Feb 6, 2010 10:57:16 GMT -5
Alrighty then. 1 more down!
|
|
|
Post by gwek on May 29, 2010 21:52:33 GMT -5
Given that Ganner has now been officially made by WotC and this is one of our longer pieces (and would therefore require a fair bit of work), I suggest we kill this piece.
|
|
|
Post by surfrider56 on May 30, 2010 1:09:19 GMT -5
While I have no objection to killing it, is their anything we might want to do with this piece that WOTC Ganner can't do?
|
|
|
Post by gwek on May 30, 2010 1:12:33 GMT -5
Our piece is very different than theirs... but our piece also requires a fair bit of work to fit comfortably on a card, I think.
The original idea for TNLT was that we would produce 20 characters who should be represented but who were not represented by WotC. Since Ganner and Lord Hoth now have official representation, they no longer apply and are, at best, "bonus pieces."
Now, I'm not opposed to bonus pieces, but since they both need work...
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on May 30, 2010 14:20:09 GMT -5
Dropping Regen and Repulse would be a start to streamlining the piece, in fact it may even fit on a card with those changes, but I wouldn't be opposed to killing it, considering that this piece has already been made (and quite effectively too) by WotC.
|
|