|
Jerec
Jul 18, 2010 22:54:50 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 18, 2010 22:54:50 GMT -5
61 works.
I see, yes, about FD. It's fine as is, I just wanted to point out a potential problem. My last post was from the perspective that Jerec was Sith, for some reason, hence the CE comment. Apologies, guys. I'm all set with the piece.
|
|
|
Jerec
Jul 18, 2010 23:55:02 GMT -5
Post by gwek on Jul 18, 2010 23:55:02 GMT -5
No worries, man.
If BH is okay with 61 as a cost, I think all we need is flavor text and we're done here.
|
|
|
Jerec
Jul 19, 2010 9:49:05 GMT -5
Post by Dendrite on Jul 19, 2010 9:49:05 GMT -5
How about:
Jerec recruited the seven Dark Jedi of Russan to help him steal the power of the Valley of the Jedi
To kill a member of the Katarn family is no easy task, even for an Imperial Inquisitor like Jerec
"You've started your journey to the dark side. But that is not enough!"
"A pity. Then you will die"
"The Valley of the Jedi will soon be mine"
"Our master is on his way to the Valley of the Jedi as we speak, a fortune you will not be so lucky to experience" - Pic
|
|
|
Jerec
Jul 19, 2010 12:49:08 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 19, 2010 12:49:08 GMT -5
The third one. I like that, or the fourth one works well too.
|
|
|
Jerec
Jul 19, 2010 13:11:17 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 19, 2010 13:11:17 GMT -5
I'm not exactly sure he's worth 61. Really, how much better is he than, say, Darth Vader, Unleashed? Maybe by a bit, but I don't think it's by too much. I'll sign off on 61 if everyone else agrees on 61, though.
|
|
|
Jerec
Jul 19, 2010 16:22:08 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 19, 2010 16:22:08 GMT -5
Well, remember, this isn't the OR, where costing mistakes aren't really a problem. We can undercost really easily in this faction, but it's hard to overcost an Imperial, at least in my experience.
|
|
|
Jerec
Jul 19, 2010 16:25:05 GMT -5
Post by gwek on Jul 19, 2010 16:25:05 GMT -5
I'm with JM. For the "big" factions, I'd rather KNOW we're going high than RISK going low.
Although he may be somewhat overpriced on his own, he has an excellent swapper to work with (which can help maximize Force Destruction), as well as very good support overall.
|
|
|
Jerec
Jul 19, 2010 17:42:52 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 19, 2010 17:42:52 GMT -5
I do agree, but are we overcosting him by too much? He's very similar to DV Unleashed, and I think a comparison to Vader Unleashed would be worthwhile in ascertaining the accuracy of Jerec's cost.
|
|
|
Jerec
Jul 19, 2010 21:54:20 GMT -5
Post by gwek on Jul 19, 2010 21:54:20 GMT -5
FYI, here's where we stand (from last page):
Jerec Cost: 61? Faction: Imperial Hit Points: 120 Defense: 20 Attack: 13 Damage: 20
Unique, Melee Attack, Double Attack Doctrine of Fear (Enemy characters within 6 squares get -4 Attack) It's A Trap (Enemies with Stealth within 6 squares lose Stealth)
Force 2, Force Renewal 1 Force Absorb (Force 2: Cancel a Force power used by an adjacent character) Force Destruction (Force 5, replaces turn: sight; 60 damage to target and 30 damage to each character adjacent to that target) Sith Lightning 30 (Force 2, replaces attacks: range 6; 30 damage)
Commander Effect: Each non-Unique ally with a Force rating starts with +1 Force.
"You've started your journey to the dark side. But that is not enough!"
*****
I suppose if you compare him to Vader Unleashed or Vader IC, he comes off as a little oferpriced... but I think it may be more accurate to say that many Vaders (those included) are actually pretty aggressively priced. I don't necessarily think Jerec should be "priced as nice" as Vader.
If you compare him to the Imperial pieces overall in the 55-62 range, I think he fits in quite nicely.
|
|
|
Jerec
Aug 7, 2010 18:25:43 GMT -5
Post by Dendrite on Aug 7, 2010 18:25:43 GMT -5
Looks like a winner
|
|
|
Jerec
Aug 8, 2010 21:55:17 GMT -5
Post by gwek on Aug 8, 2010 21:55:17 GMT -5
Right now, we have 2 votes for Jerec as-is. Since BH had some potential issues with the cost, we need a few more votes before we can finalize him.
|
|
|
Jerec
Aug 9, 2010 22:12:28 GMT -5
Post by surfrider56 on Aug 9, 2010 22:12:28 GMT -5
Well ... since I suggested 61 ... I'm still ok with it, unless BH is adamant about something lower ....
|
|
|
Jerec
Aug 10, 2010 13:53:17 GMT -5
Post by gwek on Aug 10, 2010 13:53:17 GMT -5
I think we should keep him unlocked until we get a few more opinions... hopefully including one from BH.
Can anyone get in touch with BH? I just sent him a PM via the site, but if he doesn't check the forums, I don't know if he'll know about it.
|
|
|
Jerec
Aug 10, 2010 14:08:53 GMT -5
Post by surfrider56 on Aug 10, 2010 14:08:53 GMT -5
I think we should keep him unlocked until we get a few more opinions... hopefully including one from BH. Can anyone get in touch with BH? I just sent him a PM via the site, but if he doesn't check the forums, I don't know if he'll know about it. BH seems to have disappeared from all boards about 12 days ago; most likely on vacation, which we all need sooner or later I'm sure everyone will resurface at the end of summer.
|
|
|
Jerec
Aug 11, 2010 21:39:02 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 11, 2010 21:39:02 GMT -5
Cost looks good, if everyone else likes it. I'll approve this one.
|
|