|
Yammosk
Dec 16, 2009 22:25:30 GMT -5
Post by gwek on Dec 16, 2009 22:25:30 GMT -5
And don't forget a decent commander effect, too!
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 16, 2009 22:39:25 GMT -5
Post by darthgrievous on Dec 16, 2009 22:39:25 GMT -5
Yes, yes indeed, are we still thinking +4 att +4 def...I really want this piece now. Also, since this piece is not unique, we can play more than one which means with two booming voices even if one dies the commander effect stays and savage doesnt take place either.
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 17, 2009 0:46:49 GMT -5
Post by Roque Saber on Dec 17, 2009 0:46:49 GMT -5
For the savage ability, how about something worded like this:
Savage Dependance (Allied Yuuzhan Vong gain Savage if there are no allied Yammoks in play [when this character is defeated?])
And let's think of something better than a boring +4/+4 for the CE. I really like Gregarious from the database version, something that shows their increased coordination.
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 17, 2009 8:32:45 GMT -5
Post by darthgrievous on Dec 17, 2009 8:32:45 GMT -5
Agree Gregarious would be good and not enough characters have it anyway. I think we could find a better name for "savage dependence" They aren't dependent upon savage, they are dependent upon the leadership, intelligence, reconnaissance from the Yammosk. Hmm...what about Leadership Dependence.
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 17, 2009 12:02:56 GMT -5
Post by generalgrevious on Dec 17, 2009 12:02:56 GMT -5
This is for epic wording:
Leadership Dependence (When this charater is defeated, Allied Yuuzhan Vong gain Savage as long as no other allied Yammosk is in play)
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 17, 2009 20:27:28 GMT -5
Post by darthgrievous on Dec 17, 2009 20:27:28 GMT -5
Amazing Grievous, great minds think alike.
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 17, 2009 23:42:50 GMT -5
Post by Roque Saber on Dec 17, 2009 23:42:50 GMT -5
Good wording. What sounds better, Leadership Dependence or Dependent Leadership?
So now that we've got that part down, let's piece him back together...
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 18, 2009 1:46:22 GMT -5
Post by gwek on Dec 18, 2009 1:46:22 GMT -5
I think I like the latter better.
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 18, 2009 7:32:51 GMT -5
Post by darthgrievous on Dec 18, 2009 7:32:51 GMT -5
agreed
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 18, 2009 18:15:55 GMT -5
Post by darthgrievous on Dec 18, 2009 18:15:55 GMT -5
Seems like Yammosk might be coming to a close soon, I am sooo looking forward to the Booming Voice but making sure to protect Yammosk at all costs. What are we thinking for cost? Low enough so someone can play 2?
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 18, 2009 21:40:45 GMT -5
Post by Dendrite on Dec 18, 2009 21:40:45 GMT -5
As a side note, for leadership dependance (or however it is to be named) perhaps also something that grants Protective +10 for Vong within 6?
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 19, 2009 0:54:13 GMT -5
Post by Roque Saber on Dec 19, 2009 0:54:13 GMT -5
I'm against the Protective part, I think it would just make the SA too wordy (good idea though ) So here's what we got. Yammosk Cost: 45-55 (still not sure) HP: 100-130 Defense: 15 Attack: 0 Damage: 0 Special Abilities: Melee Attack Booming Voice Emplacement? Rapport? Dependent Leadership (When this charater is defeated, allied Yuuzhan Vong gain Savage as long as no other allied Yammosk is in play) Commander Effect: Yuuzhan Vong gain Gregarious Should Dependent Leadership only affect non-uniques? What about Emplacement? etc, etc, etc.
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 19, 2009 7:25:13 GMT -5
Post by darthgrievous on Dec 19, 2009 7:25:13 GMT -5
Wow I am a bit concerned about his cost...hes not unique for 1, Mas Amedda has booming voice for 8 points, emplacement is technically a bad thing, and the leadership makes it bad when he dies, gregarious is good, but for 45-55 points, hardly worth playing. Couldnt we keep the same stats and drop his cost at this point since we eliminated so many things from before, like his ability to attack.
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 19, 2009 13:19:26 GMT -5
Post by Dendrite on Dec 19, 2009 13:19:26 GMT -5
I agree. I calculate no more than 30
|
|
|
Yammosk
Dec 20, 2009 9:51:13 GMT -5
Post by darthgrievous on Dec 20, 2009 9:51:13 GMT -5
Yea no more than 30 that way you can efficiently play 2 of them if you want to gain that ultra booming voice without having to worry about savage vong, which would be terrible, can you imagine losing all that super stealth you just got from Nom? or that Momentum from Tsavong Lah? And if you don't want to play 2 of them then you can fill that slot with lots of super stealth scouts.
|
|