|
|
Sith
Jun 19, 2009 21:24:38 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 19, 2009 21:24:38 GMT -5
Alright. Also, on Lord Bane, did we decide on 180 HP? Or is 160 still a possibility? I can't remember.
Also, for Sith Betrayal, would changing the name to Dominate Mind and dropping the saving throw to 11 be alright? I just want to prevent some possible confusion.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 20, 2009 12:35:11 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 20, 2009 12:35:11 GMT -5
Also, I've added in all SA and FP definitions. Whew. That was a workout. I think I have finished with the definitions for this set.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 20, 2009 20:57:41 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 20, 2009 20:57:41 GMT -5
Wow. That's impressive. I just go through and do it as I put it in as I go.
As for the above post, whatever you prefer is better.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 21, 2009 7:42:41 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 21, 2009 7:42:41 GMT -5
Yeah, this was interesting. I have memorized word-for-word most of the repeat SA and FP definitions, so that'll help if/when I do it again.
Okay, I'll change Sith Betrayal to Dominate Mind and leave Bane's HP as is. There is about 10 points between them, and this one has less (I think) damage potential.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 21, 2009 14:47:07 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 21, 2009 14:47:07 GMT -5
Yeah, true. WotC's Bane is still powerful in today's game.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 21, 2009 16:45:41 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 21, 2009 16:45:41 GMT -5
Yeah, but he actually needs some support now, not like when he first came out when he was nigh unstoppable. So we're good with 180 HP, right?
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 21, 2009 19:59:14 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 21, 2009 19:59:14 GMT -5
Yeah. Whatever you prefer.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 21, 2009 20:39:08 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 21, 2009 20:39:08 GMT -5
Okay, I'll leave it at 180. With that said, is this faction done until someone else posts, or is there something I've missed?
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 22, 2009 12:31:10 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 22, 2009 12:31:10 GMT -5
No, I think everything's done here.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 22, 2009 17:31:58 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 22, 2009 17:31:58 GMT -5
Okay, sounds good.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jul 2, 2009 17:24:46 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 2, 2009 17:24:46 GMT -5
I was thinking, and could Revan, Sith Army Commander's CE (the first part) affect allies instead of followers? I was just comparing him to CS Yoda when I decided to use that, but with the new Leia costing only 25 points and having it at allies, could we change it? Revan is a lot more expensive, and he is a non-combatant. The only "problem" would be Krayt, who is pretty much gauranteed to reduce all damage by 10, but that is a very expensive combination. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jul 3, 2009 12:35:14 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 3, 2009 12:35:14 GMT -5
Typically, strong CE's benefit followers - so the "real" Revan, Malak, and Krayt wouldn't have access to it, while weaker CE's (and generally good guy CE's) benefit allies.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jul 3, 2009 13:09:07 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 3, 2009 13:09:07 GMT -5
That is true, but this is Revan we're talking about, who is more 'good', even as a Sith, than Malak or Maul would be. Idk. I could go either way.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jul 3, 2009 17:24:47 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 3, 2009 17:24:47 GMT -5
The CE isn't too powerful. Non-Unique makes a lot of that problem go away, so I think it'd be fine if all allies gained Bodyguard.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jul 3, 2009 17:45:31 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 3, 2009 17:45:31 GMT -5
Bodyguard? Oh, I think your mixing up your Revans. I meant the reroll failed saves on the Sith army Revan.
|
|
Man