|
Sith
Jun 13, 2009 18:31:21 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 13, 2009 18:31:21 GMT -5
Oh. Huh. The six square radius probably prevents the brokenness factor, but it's certainly interesting.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 13, 2009 18:52:11 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 13, 2009 18:52:11 GMT -5
Yeah, he would drop like a rock, which is also why you have to have line of sight of the enemy in PoP, which (if they are a shooter) could give them a chance to attack you. He would probably be within firing distance if the enemy is within 6, so I don't think it would be broken.
I have absolutely no idea where to start on costing him. What do you think?
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 14, 2009 8:49:59 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 14, 2009 8:49:59 GMT -5
Also, I added in the final mini of the set: Darth Traya, Lord of Betrayal. What do you think of her? I kind of threw a cost up there, so is 58 accurate?
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 14, 2009 17:17:02 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 14, 2009 17:17:02 GMT -5
Okay, right now I am going through the set and throwing costs up for the figs that don't have a cost yet. Be sure to tell me if you think they are off.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 15, 2009 20:29:54 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 15, 2009 20:29:54 GMT -5
I'm going to steal Lord of Betrayal. And I think Sith Betrayal costs too much in terms of FP.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 15, 2009 20:34:05 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 15, 2009 20:34:05 GMT -5
Lol. I'm fine with that.
I thought that Sith Betrayal did cost a ton of FP to use, and although it is a very useful power, it isn't really Force 6 worthy. I don't think I can change it though, as it is a database ability (I believe I a Nihilus and a Traya have it in the Sith database).
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 15, 2009 20:39:40 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 15, 2009 20:39:40 GMT -5
Oh, who cares? The entire Mandalorian part of FotR came out of the database - which is 13/60 of the set - and we changed those.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 15, 2009 20:55:03 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 15, 2009 20:55:03 GMT -5
Lol. That is true. What would be a good FP cost, then? I'm thinking around 4 or 5.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 19, 2009 18:56:03 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 19, 2009 18:56:03 GMT -5
3 or 4.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 19, 2009 19:12:57 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 19, 2009 19:12:57 GMT -5
Hmm. I'll set it at 4 for now.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 19, 2009 19:46:51 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 19, 2009 19:46:51 GMT -5
Yeah. Good plan.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 19, 2009 20:02:49 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 19, 2009 20:02:49 GMT -5
Okay, I put it at 4. It does replace turn and it has to have sight, so I think it is fine. Anything else here?
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 19, 2009 20:13:58 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 19, 2009 20:13:58 GMT -5
Not that I can see.
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 19, 2009 20:17:07 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 19, 2009 20:17:07 GMT -5
Okay, sounds good. I should have the SA/FP defintions up shortly...
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 19, 2009 20:19:57 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 19, 2009 20:19:57 GMT -5
Ok.
|
|