|
|
Sith
Jun 1, 2009 14:51:07 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 1, 2009 14:51:07 GMT -5
Lol. With your help. You suggested +10 damage on crits, and without that suggestion, I probably would never have thought of Vicious.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 1, 2009 15:54:53 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 1, 2009 15:54:53 GMT -5
Ah. I see.
Anything else you want me to look at?
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 1, 2009 16:19:47 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 1, 2009 16:19:47 GMT -5
Hmm. I don't think so, at least for now.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 6, 2009 8:59:50 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 6, 2009 8:59:50 GMT -5
Okay, Lord Bane added. Tell me what you think of him.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 9, 2009 19:21:14 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 9, 2009 19:21:14 GMT -5
Scary as hell, but I think we can make it work for around 90 pts.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 10, 2009 14:25:42 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 10, 2009 14:25:42 GMT -5
Lol. That's about where I was going with him. I will drop the HP a bit, to 160, as he can be even tougher to take out that WotC's Bane (Lightsaber Duelist, Lightsaber Defense).
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 10, 2009 19:07:06 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 10, 2009 19:07:06 GMT -5
Eh. I think 160 or 180 is fine. If you want to lower the cost, then yes, 160 would be better.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 10, 2009 19:21:18 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 10, 2009 19:21:18 GMT -5
It's not so much that I want to lower the cost (although I do picture him in the low 90s, and this will help him to get there), but I don't want him to overshadow WotC's Bane, even though they are different in many ways.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 11, 2009 16:14:49 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 11, 2009 16:14:49 GMT -5
Yeah, well, WotC's Bane isn't that playable anymore.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 11, 2009 16:29:58 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 11, 2009 16:29:58 GMT -5
That is somewhat true, at least for the moment with all the extremely powerful shooters out there and a huge lack of support from the rest of his faction (Krayt is really the only way to boost him, but that's insanely expensive).
So, do you think he should have HP 160 or 180? I would be fine with either, I just wanted to keep him different from WotC's Bane.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 11, 2009 18:57:26 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 11, 2009 18:57:26 GMT -5
Also, I added Darth Sidious, Sith Mastermind. What do you think of him?
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 12, 2009 15:09:18 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 12, 2009 15:09:18 GMT -5
EDIT: Darth Sidious, Sith Mastermind changed to Lord Sidious (to prevent confusion with WotC's Darth Sidious, Sith Master).
And he has 3 starting Force instead of 2, making Dark Master more useful.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 12, 2009 19:20:14 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 12, 2009 19:20:14 GMT -5
And I have also added in Darth Maul, Legacy of the Dark Side. He has Affinity for the Seps. Do you think Sidious should have it too, or just Maul (or not even have it on Maul)?
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 13, 2009 17:18:14 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jun 13, 2009 17:18:14 GMT -5
Yeah, both the Maul and Sidious are good figures. I might add in a Jedi Hunter to my Maul, that's a good idea.
Powers of Persuasion should have the full definition of Internal Strife written out.
|
|
|
|
Sith
Jun 13, 2009 17:46:16 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 13, 2009 17:46:16 GMT -5
That is true (on PoP). I will write it out now.
What do you think of Sidious's CE? It is VERY experimental and would probably need playtesting in order to see if it's broken or not, and to see if it's not too odd. What do you think?
|
|
Man