Imperial

[bountyhunter9]

Here is the complete list of Imperial minis and their accompanying stats from my new custom set, A Galaxy Divided. Feel free to comment on anything you like or dislike, and bring to attention an incomplete or inaccurate ability description, or something that needs a rename, etc.

1. AT-PT
2. Boba Fett, Imperial Mercenary
3. IT-O Interrogator Droid

---

1. AT-PT

Faction: Imperial
Rarity: Uncommon
Cost: 27
Hit Points: 60
Defense: 16
Attack: +9
Damage: 20

Special Abilities:
Damage Reduction 10
Grenades 20
Mounted Weapon
Rigid
Stable Footing
Twin Attack

---

2. Boba Fett, Imperial Mercenary

Faction: Imperial
Rarity: Very Rare
Cost: 51
Hit Points: 110
Defense: 20
Attack: +11
Damage: 20

Special Abilities:
Unique
Flight
Accurate Shot
Bounty Hunter +4
Cunning Attack
Double Attack
Greater Mobile Attack
Jolt

"You are free to use any methods necessary, but I want them alive. No disintegrations." --Darth Vader

3. IT-O Interrogator Droid

Faction: Imperial
Rarity: Common
Cost: 12
Hit Points: 20
Defense: 15
Attack: +4
Damage: 10

Special Abilities:
Droid
Flight
Melee Attack
Doctrine of Fear (Enemy characters within 6 squares get -4 attack)
Paralysis (A living enemy hit by this character's attack is considered activated this round; save 11)
Virulent Poison +20 (+20 damage to living enemy; save 11)

[Jm419]

AT-PT should have Rigid, probably. Now restructure that sentence so it's grammatically acceptable.

Boba looks good, except that he has GMA!!!!

Wow. That IT-0 is a cool piece. I like it a lot. Well done, once again.

[bountyhunter9]

Lol. Nice catch, though. It definitely should have Rigid. No way a walker is squeezing. Btw, the AT-PT would have a Large base.

Lol. He can still only deal 60 damage a round. but the Cunning/Jolt combo should be fun.

Thanks. I really like it too, but I'm not sure if the cost is accurate. Do you think it is, considering the effectiveness of Doctrine of Fear?

[Jm419]

Only a Large? Not a Huge?

Yeah, that's true.

It can't hurt to bump it up.

[bountyhunter9]

No, AT-PTs were very small walkers (only about 3 metres tall) and were relatively compact, and close to the ground. They were very stable too. Maybe I should give it Stable Footing. Lol.

Okay, I increased the IT-O to 12. It's very fragile, but can really hurt a living enemy, and DoF can be very powerful.

[Jm419]

Really? I thought they were much bigger than that. They looked about the same size as AT-STs in Rogue Squadron.

That's a little better, yes.

[bountyhunter9]

Lol. Wook says they're only 3 metres tall, and I have a book that confirms that. Rogue Squadron must have been out of scale there. But I loved that game. It's probably my favourite SW computer game that doesn't feature Kyle Katarn. Unless he's in it. I don't remember.

Lol. A whole point. It'll be a big target tho, and raising the point cost only increases the size of that target.

Also, I changed up the AT-PT slightly.

[Jm419]

No, he isn't in it. Lol. Kyle's abilities always seemed greatly exaggerated to me. He's like the Chuck Norris of Star Wars.

"Tho"? What are you, a teenage girl?

Not Speed 8, or anything?

[bountyhunter9]

Lol. He's an awesome character though. His story is really interesting. And remember, he did save the Valley of the Jedi. I think he's the most powerful Jedi in the NJO, other than Luke, of course.

Lol. Sorry. I'm typing on here and on Windows Live, so I'm going from using shortforms and leaving out apostrophes and ignoring proper case, to typing in normal sentences. Lol. We seem to use at least that much of Internet shorthand here, though.

No, the AT-PT was described as being more agile than fast.

[Jm419]

That's the problem - he was just invented. But, so was Revan, so w/e. And as for Bane being the Sith'ari - didn't Revan teach him everything? Both in the ancient texts and the holocron? Btw, I'm planning on checking out the wall behind the computer on Lehon when I get there, to see if there's a special panel...

It happens. Lol. Btw. We use them all the time.

Ok, then Stable Footing covers that role.

[bountyhunter9]

Yeah. Well, all Star Wars characters were invented, but it's often easier to determine their power level from the movies. Video games can exaggerate it (either too powerful or not powerful enough), and the books can be even worse than the video games at exaggerating. Thankfully we have SWM to determine who is more powerful than whom.

Lol. Yeah, we do. Saves a lot of time.

Yeah, it does. I don't think the AT-PT has AT-ST syndrome (tripping on logs), so it fits.

[Jm419]

I do believe the 30 Damage on Bane was an error. A lightsaber doesn't do any more damage if it's going faster (which is the only real point of strength in SW lightsaber fighting). At least, I don't think it would...not that there's any way to test that hypothesis.

Meh. That's onomatopeia for you.

Well, if you rolled logs down a hill at an F-22, it wouldn't do so well either. Lol.

[bountyhunter9]

That's an interesting point. The 30 damage is an interesting, unique feature of Bane, but it isn't really accurate.

Lol.

Lol. If it was taking off. Otherwise it would just crash into the trees.

[Jm419]

Right. Oh well.

Trees? Where do trees come in? Is this F-22 in the middle of a forest? Of course, if the Imperials did park an F-22 in the middle of a forest, they deserve to lose.

[bountyhunter9]

LOL. They so would. But I don't know where else you would find logs to roll at it. Of course, I'm not sure why you'd roll logs at it...but Ewoks can do anything. Lol.