|
|
Fringe
Jul 13, 2009 17:56:31 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 13, 2009 17:56:31 GMT -5
Yeah, roughly. I think you're overcosting Zam a little, but not much - 1-2 points.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 13, 2009 19:08:29 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 13, 2009 19:08:29 GMT -5
Okay, I set HK at 36, and Zam at 37.
Does the cost look good on the LIN?
And, for the Duelist Elite, would 19-22 be good for the cost?
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 13, 2009 20:13:52 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 13, 2009 20:13:52 GMT -5
Yeah, that'd work well.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 13, 2009 21:43:51 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 13, 2009 21:43:51 GMT -5
Okay, I went aggresive and costed him at 19. Now, last one. Would about 29-34 be good for Gorm?
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 10:54:29 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 14, 2009 10:54:29 GMT -5
28-35, I'd say.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 11:10:11 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 14, 2009 11:10:11 GMT -5
Okay, I set him at 33. Does everyone and everything look good here?
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 11:22:25 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 14, 2009 11:22:25 GMT -5
It's a lot of stuff to look over. I'll get back to you.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 11:37:46 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 14, 2009 11:37:46 GMT -5
Yeah, it is. I'll be waiting.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 18:20:50 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 14, 2009 18:20:50 GMT -5
Oh, triple and twin again on CBWD.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 20:17:24 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 14, 2009 20:17:24 GMT -5
Oh yeah. Is it a problem with base 10 damage? It might be, especially with Assault and potentially Opportunist from Mitt'hrawn (the only CE I can think of that boosts damage on non-uniques). Hmm. We could drop it to Double/Twin, up the cost, or drop Assault. Personally, I would like to drop Assault, but I'm open to suggestions.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 21:48:07 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 14, 2009 21:48:07 GMT -5
Assault is probably best, especially if you want to drop it.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 21:51:47 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 14, 2009 21:51:47 GMT -5
Okay, I'll take it off. Does that impact the cost at all?
And, is there anything else that needs revision?
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 14, 2009 22:02:03 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Jul 14, 2009 22:02:03 GMT -5
You are aware that Heavy Brawling Claws allows for four attacks - a possible 80 damage at +11 attack?
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Jul 15, 2009 9:24:26 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 15, 2009 9:24:26 GMT -5
That is true, but it is against adjacent, and gives you incentive to use it over Triple/Twin because it can do more damage at a higher attack bonus. But maybe we could drop it to 1 attack at 30 damage. Would this be better?
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Aug 3, 2009 16:19:42 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Aug 3, 2009 16:19:42 GMT -5
Oh, I was just checking if you were aware of that. It works, I was just a but unsure if you wanted it that way or not.
|
|
Man
