|
Post by Roque Saber on Dec 9, 2009 14:28:13 GMT -5
Ok, if you want to keep it, you can.
One more thing, I just noticed he doesn't have Dark Armor and only has Deflect. I would add either more HP, Dark Armor, or lower the cost. GMY is 55, has 150 HP, and Lightsaber Defense for comparison.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Chaos on Dec 9, 2009 14:56:48 GMT -5
Ok, if you want to keep it, you can. One more thing, I just noticed he doesn't have Dark Armor and only has Deflect. I would add either more HP, Dark Armor, or lower the cost. GMY is 55, has 150 HP, and Lightsaber Defense for comparison. I think GMY is a bit undercosted, but I think bumping him to 150 and giving him Lightsaber Defense instead would be applicable. After that, what do you think? 62? 64?
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Dec 9, 2009 17:17:45 GMT -5
If it was up to me, I would just lower the cost (I think 67 is a bit high for him anyway), to about 59 (assuming no changes are made). The thing I have against 150 HP is that WotC's Revan has 140, and it would seem odd to have a younger, less experienced Revan with more HP that the one that represents him at the peak of his power. It's up to you, though: Lightsaber Defense instead of Deflect and a cost of about 62 would be good as well.
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Dec 9, 2009 23:53:03 GMT -5
Not undercosted, aggresively costed. I kinda agree with BH9, HP should stay at 140, though Lightsaber Defense would be welcome. More defense to overcome his slightly lacking offense.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Chaos on Dec 10, 2009 16:22:58 GMT -5
Alright, I tweaked him. Let me know if you guys think he's ready for playtesting.
DC
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Dec 10, 2009 16:45:47 GMT -5
I think he looks good. Let us know how the playtesting turns out.
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Dec 10, 2009 19:49:22 GMT -5
Looks good, last change I would make is to lower the cost a tad.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Chaos on Dec 11, 2009 0:26:21 GMT -5
I dropped it to 62. Still too high?
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Dec 11, 2009 23:55:03 GMT -5
I'm thinking around 60 would be good, but 62 could work. Need another opinion...
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Dec 12, 2009 9:44:58 GMT -5
We're talking a matter of points here, but I suggested 62 before, and I still think that would be good. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Dec 20, 2009 12:41:05 GMT -5
It really doesn't matter, it's only +/- 2 points. But the cost should be in that range.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Chaos on Dec 20, 2009 15:13:16 GMT -5
Cool! Thanks, everyone!
|
|
|
Post by Nelson Huang on Jan 3, 2010 4:58:00 GMT -5
Omg this is awesome! Most impressive! Could you please tell me how and which program you used to make this card? I would love to learn! Email me back on my personal account on nelson.huang007@gmail.com please? Oh and I am Nelson btw.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Chaos on Jan 16, 2010 22:18:44 GMT -5
Omg this is awesome! Most impressive! Could you please tell me how and which program you used to make this card? I would love to learn! Email me back on my personal account on nelson.huang007@gmail.com please? Oh and I am Nelson btw. I sent you the files. And thanks for the kind words.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Chaos on Feb 15, 2010 13:56:47 GMT -5
We're probably going to up the cost on this character to 72 or 74. I play-tested him with a few Jedi Watchmen and Jedi Weapon Masters, and it's nasty.
Thoughts?
|
|