|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 23, 2009 16:28:10 GMT -5
Could he go toe-to-toe with Bane, or Vader, JH? I mean character-wise?
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 24, 2009 8:50:05 GMT -5
When empowered with the power of the Valley of the Jedi on Ruusan, he became extremely powerful. Maybe not quite as powerful, but probably high 50s to mid 60s powerful.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 24, 2009 12:04:33 GMT -5
Then he probably needs to be toned down. I'd cost that version in the high 70s.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 24, 2009 15:39:36 GMT -5
What would you suggest? I like him as is, but base 20 damage would probably be better. I'll also drop his HP to 140. Keep in mind that he has no defenses whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 26, 2009 9:50:17 GMT -5
Yeah, unless he was like Bane, six foot six, three hundred pounds, all muscle, and using a special sort of lightsaber.
This is better, we're talking mid 60s now.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 26, 2009 13:21:53 GMT -5
Lol. Pretty close. You know Jerec? He has a head (a large head) on him. And he's probably around 300 pounds. And he has an extra-large lightsaber. Anyway, I think he's better like this. 64 good for the cost?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 26, 2009 13:43:35 GMT -5
Yeah, that sounds fine to me.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 28, 2009 17:18:41 GMT -5
Okay, so how does everything look here?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 28, 2009 17:57:23 GMT -5
Yeah, I'd say so. I don't think there are any problems? Are there any you want me to look at specifically?
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 29, 2009 9:29:20 GMT -5
I don't think so. The Shadow EVO scares me, though, with all the commander effects that could affect it (it is a trooper). What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 29, 2009 13:23:49 GMT -5
Any trooper can get those - that's why the Raxus prime trooper replaced the Stormie ( )
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 29, 2009 18:15:53 GMT -5
That is true (and sad), but on a piece with Cloaked and Double, +6 defense and Opportunist is scary. Maybe I should just raise the cost a couple of points. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 31, 2009 19:08:59 GMT -5
To be safe. 2 or 3, at most, I'd say.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 31, 2009 21:30:28 GMT -5
Okay, I'll set the cost at 25. I think that should be good.
Everything look good here?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 31, 2009 21:44:55 GMT -5
Yeah, I'd say so.
|
|