|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 13, 2009 17:56:29 GMT -5
After comparing them, I came up with a cost that could range from 55-58, and I set his cost at 56. Does that look good?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 13, 2009 18:33:06 GMT -5
I was thinking more high 40s low 50s. 54 would probably be overcosting, so I was thinking 48-52.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 13, 2009 18:53:43 GMT -5
Huh. Really? Comparing him to Nelvaan Annie (who is slightly overcosted, probably b/c of the huge mistake they made with GOWK), he is superior in almost every way.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 15, 2009 20:31:56 GMT -5
Yes, but like you said, NA is overcosted significantly. 53 would be on the high end, I'd say.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 15, 2009 20:37:46 GMT -5
Okay, so should he be around 50, then? I really don't want to go to 49 or lower, as he is better than Anakin, CoN, and I don't want him to always be a better option. So would 50, 51 be good?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 15, 2009 20:40:39 GMT -5
Yes. 52 would be a good compromise.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 15, 2009 20:56:24 GMT -5
Okay, I'll change it.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 17, 2009 8:20:01 GMT -5
Okay, I changed Ataru Style Mastery on Yoda to WotC's new Ataru Mastery. Would this up the cost? I don't think so, as it's very situational, like Ataru Style, in fact I might need to drop the cost. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 18, 2009 18:44:43 GMT -5
Okay, I added in all SA and FP definitions. Be sure to tell me if one is incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 19, 2009 19:52:46 GMT -5
I'm checking, but I haven't found any.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 19, 2009 20:05:44 GMT -5
Okay, thanks.
What do you think of the Ataru Mastery change on Yoda? Would it affect the cost?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 19, 2009 20:15:15 GMT -5
No. If anything, it'd make the cost go down. d**n. Now I have to change the Ataru Mastery on my Yoda.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 19, 2009 20:22:17 GMT -5
Lol. Yeah. I really like the Ataru Mastery he did have, but I don't want one different from WotC's. With it being even more powerful than Ataru, it will probably happen even less than Ataru. I guess it's a good counter to Loners, because, you know, that SA always comes into play...
Would a cost of 72-75 be alright?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 19, 2009 20:23:22 GMT -5
Yeah.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 19, 2009 20:39:53 GMT -5
Okay, cost set at 74.
|
|