|
Post by Roque Saber on Apr 23, 2009 14:36:21 GMT -5
If this is meant to be a horde piece, it should be far cheaper, unless we give it the Horde SA.
However, most pieces have access to some sort of defensive, or damage reducing ability. Making a piece that costs 24 points (or less if we kept his HP at 40) with no sort of defensive or damage reducing ability go run up to an enemy hoping to get an attack off is suicide at best. It is a complete waste of points, and a waste of a miniature.
So, instead of arguing back and forth, why don't we just bump his HP up to 50 or 60, and bump his cost down to high-teens early 20's.
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Apr 23, 2009 14:55:47 GMT -5
It's up to Sharrakor and others, but if you're arguing with me over the cost being 20+, maybe you should go back and read the last page. There are two different posts where I recommended dropping the cost to the high teens. I even agreed that the HP should probably go up (although we may disagree on HOW high it should go... I personally think 50 is enough for now, at a cost of 18 or so).
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Apr 23, 2009 16:18:41 GMT -5
If it's going to be a melee piece, 50 or 60 IMO is about the minimum.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 23, 2009 19:08:28 GMT -5
Well, the real question is about the role of this piece. Then we can decide base stats.
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Apr 23, 2009 20:43:57 GMT -5
That's probably something we would need to ask Sharrakor, since he made the piece.
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Apr 23, 2009 23:55:33 GMT -5
I like 50 on the piece, and 60 is still within the Mando "range."
Sharrakor, what are you thinking? Lower the price a bit, up the HP? You like?
|
|
|
Post by Sharrakor on Apr 24, 2009 3:34:44 GMT -5
You know, if you want to know what I intended this piece to be, please go back a page. I've already answered that question.
And yeah, sure. Lower the cost, up the HP. Whatever works.
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Apr 24, 2009 9:45:33 GMT -5
Ah, thank you. Then I would agree that 50 or 60 would be ok. If it's kind of like a Mando-EWW, then we might be able to somewhat base the stats and abilities off of that piece.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 24, 2009 18:34:25 GMT -5
Oh. Indeed. Sorry Sharrakor.
|
|
|
Post by Sharrakor on Apr 24, 2009 18:43:32 GMT -5
No problem.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 24, 2009 18:55:18 GMT -5
Then do you have any specific preferences on this piece? It is yours, and we don't want to change your concept too much.
|
|
|
Post by Sharrakor on Apr 24, 2009 19:04:12 GMT -5
The only thing that seems to have been discussed is raising the HP, which I've already done.
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Apr 24, 2009 21:01:54 GMT -5
I think you can also drop the price.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 24, 2009 22:55:10 GMT -5
The name needs to be changed. And we might drop LR; I think we have another Mando in the works that has it. It's not that big of a deal if you choose to keep it, but it's a little redundant.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Nov 8, 2009 17:57:04 GMT -5
Okay, so how about Mandalorian Neo-Crusader for the name? And I agree on dropping LR.
|
|