|
|
Post by maverick on Jan 6, 2009 0:42:59 GMT -5
Luke Skywalker of Dathomir
Rebel
Cost
HP 80
Def 18
Att 9
Dmg 20
Unique
Double
Melee Attack
Force 6
Force Heal 20
Lightsaber throw
Force Leap
Lightsaber Deflect
Force Revival (Force 2: Whenever this character would be defeated, make a save of 6; on a success, this character is restored to full Hit Points instead of being defeated)
|
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Feb 2, 2009 1:06:49 GMT -5
I would set Revival at a specific number to keep it consistent with the feel of existing WotC special abilities.
|
|
|
|
Post by planeswalker459 on Feb 2, 2009 15:55:38 GMT -5
With 80 hp, I would set it at 5 or 6, that way once revived he can then actually heal himself....plus, witha high cost, it negates the potential for multiple uses over thegame (much like Sion)
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Feb 2, 2009 18:30:09 GMT -5
Planeswalker's correct, I think (no offense, Gwek).
|
|
|
|
Post by maverick on Feb 2, 2009 20:59:29 GMT -5
So like Force 6 instead of renewal??
And cost like about in the mid-40s?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Feb 2, 2009 22:22:06 GMT -5
No Renewal? What?
|
|
|
|
Post by maverick on Feb 3, 2009 15:42:59 GMT -5
I would set Revival at a specific number to keep it consistent with the feel of existing WotC special abilities. I'm confused as to what this is referring to |
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Feb 3, 2009 18:22:58 GMT -5
Force Revival. Set it at like Force 4 with 40 heal, or something like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by maverick on Feb 4, 2009 7:06:25 GMT -5
updated. Made Revival like a Master Recovery since Recovery only costs one fp to gain back 20
|
|
|
|
Post by planeswalker459 on Feb 4, 2009 14:31:30 GMT -5
Not bad. I see wher ya going with this. I like it overall
|
|
|
|
Post by maverick on Feb 4, 2009 15:55:18 GMT -5
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Feb 5, 2009 1:16:12 GMT -5
Planeswalker's correct, I think (no offense, Gwek). No offense taken, JM! As for Force Revival, if it's an improved version of Recovery, why not just call it Recovery? Revival worked when the character could come back from defeat. That aspect seems to be missing now, so the name doesn't work as much. |
|
|
|
Post by maverick on Feb 5, 2009 6:51:30 GMT -5
Planeswalker's correct, I think (no offense, Gwek). No offense taken, JM! As for Force Revival, if it's an improved version of Recovery, why not just call it Recovery? Revival worked when the character could come back from defeat. That aspect seems to be missing now, so the name doesn't work as much. you're right. I'm going to think about reworking it to make more of a "Revival" |
|
|
|
Post by maverick on Feb 6, 2009 1:42:03 GMT -5
new revival
|
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Feb 9, 2009 3:02:01 GMT -5
Agree with gwek here...look at existing "Im back, bwahahah" abilities, especially since it has been changed again.
|
|
Man