|
|
Fringe
Oct 10, 2009 18:41:20 GMT -5
Post by Sharrakor on Oct 10, 2009 18:41:20 GMT -5
I think I agree with what Jm said before, that most of the Taris duelists fit their costs, but they aren't spectacular alternatives at their costs.
However I'd say out of the 6(?) of them, Marl, the Rodian and Bendak are all very good. Marl represents at strong non-Force using melee combatant, something of which this game doesn't have a lot of. The Rodian is just simply cool, very reminiscent of the Echani HM who is a strong piece in its own right. And Bendak is BF,BH lite which seems to be a general consensus on what he'd look like.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 11, 2009 20:32:16 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 11, 2009 20:32:16 GMT -5
Yeah. GMA is good on certain pieces, mostly non-melee or certain melee pieces (love it on Shado Vao). For some reason, there's just a nice feeling you get when you get to move 6 squares for "free", when your opponent can't. Another reason why I like to plat Revan or Caedus a lot.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 11, 2009 20:41:08 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 11, 2009 20:41:08 GMT -5
Whoops, just saw Sharrakor's post on the next page.
I do agree on the duelists, they're not spectacular, but decent. I never thought about that with Marl - but you're completely right. I can't think of a decent, non-Force using, lower cost melee interference piece. Good to have you back, Sharrakor.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 11, 2009 20:43:40 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Oct 11, 2009 20:43:40 GMT -5
Indeed, Sharrakor, we're lucky indeed to get you back. Another one of the old guard.
Revan's fun, but still overcosted. Too bad there isn't a piece that has an ability like, "Supreme Tactics: (Choose one character. That character costs 15 points less than the posted cost.)" Then he'd be playable.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 11, 2009 21:29:09 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 11, 2009 21:29:09 GMT -5
Yeah. I play him as though he costed 68 - almost seems like house rules. He should have been a very, very good character. I hope (and I mean HOPE) that we get a new Sith Revan in Masters of the Force, or at the very least a Revan, Redeemed for the OR.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 12, 2009 21:28:22 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Oct 12, 2009 21:28:22 GMT -5
We won't, though - that'd almost make the OR useful. WotC can't have that.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 13, 2009 15:56:36 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 13, 2009 15:56:36 GMT -5
Yeah. They'll probably overcost him by like 20 points again, if they make one.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 13, 2009 17:04:42 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Oct 13, 2009 17:04:42 GMT -5
Lol. That's what we should make our Revan in GOWK. Terrible, and way overcosted.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 13, 2009 17:53:57 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 13, 2009 17:53:57 GMT -5
Lol. Like 120 points for things similar to the Sith Revan.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 16, 2009 15:37:57 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Oct 16, 2009 15:37:57 GMT -5
My thoughts exactly.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 16, 2009 16:53:26 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 16, 2009 16:53:26 GMT -5
Yeah.
So, does everything look good here? I don't think there are any more characters to cost...
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 16, 2009 21:45:55 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Oct 16, 2009 21:45:55 GMT -5
Yeah. Nice job on this set, by the way.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 17, 2009 11:41:11 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 17, 2009 11:41:11 GMT -5
Thanks. It did turn out better than I expected, especially the non-501st part.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 17, 2009 13:29:00 GMT -5
Post by Jm419 on Oct 17, 2009 13:29:00 GMT -5
I agree with that.
|
|
|
|
Fringe
Oct 18, 2009 18:01:43 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 18, 2009 18:01:43 GMT -5
That's good. So which do you think is my better set: Rule of Two or Vader's Fist?
|
|
Man