|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 26, 2009 19:41:28 GMT -5
Yeah. The rockets were deadly in BF II. I liked how, in BF I, the Rebel rocket launcher shot two rockets, one after the other. That was cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 26, 2009 20:52:16 GMT -5
Yeah, but it's mildly irritating when, say, you're shooting at an AT-AT, and you don't know about the second missle, and you aim down to see how high up you are on the roof of the bunker, the second missle shoots out and hits the roof, then you go flying...and get spiked by that AT-AT when you're soaring hundreds of feet in the air. Mildly irritating.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 27, 2009 12:26:17 GMT -5
Lol. True. But it punches a whole in an AT-ST the size of a Gamorrean.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 27, 2009 18:02:19 GMT -5
Lol. Now, that'd be cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 27, 2009 19:12:30 GMT -5
Oh yeah. Like the Ewok traps actually smashing the cage in. Or throwing a grenade inside the AT-ST. That would be cool.
"What the he!! is this?"
"Oh @$+% !!!"
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 27, 2009 20:29:57 GMT -5
LOL. That'd be a horrible way to die.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 28, 2009 9:39:26 GMT -5
Yeah. So would getting crushed by the Ewok traps, but I would think they're both pretty quick. Better than facing Vader.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 28, 2009 19:43:52 GMT -5
Vader'd be like,
"Oh, did I cut off your finger? Oh, that's too bad. Does that hurt?"
Vooom
*Screams of agony*
"Oh, look at that, you have a burn on your leg."
Voom
*Screams of agony*
"Oh, dear, my saber appears to have slipped, and cut off your hand. Sorry 'bout that."
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 29, 2009 9:29:05 GMT -5
Lol. Then he'd stab you, throw you out into space, rescue you, rebuild you, and do it again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 29, 2009 15:52:23 GMT -5
Lol. Exactly.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 29, 2009 17:04:34 GMT -5
Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Nov 14, 2009 16:36:51 GMT -5
Okay, I managed to get rarities up. Lmk what you think of my decisions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Nov 14, 2009 16:55:43 GMT -5
They look fine. I don't usually assign rarities, so that's fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Nov 15, 2009 14:04:14 GMT -5
Yeah. I like it, it's a nice addition. I'm trying to do it for TLF, but I've already got my limit for Rares, 20 pieces into the set. Lol. I may have to bend the set rules a bit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Nov 15, 2009 18:55:02 GMT -5
I tend to think it makes the setlist too cluttered. I like my version; but rarities aren't bad, either.
|
|
Man