|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 28, 2009 17:25:13 GMT -5
Yeah. I'll look up the Canderous, see if I can make a mini out of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 29, 2009 16:27:54 GMT -5
Okay, I've added in the Canderous-class Assault Tank. What do you think? 58 good for the cost?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 30, 2009 14:10:37 GMT -5
Yeah, but lower the HP to about 100, 120.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 30, 2009 14:31:13 GMT -5
Okay, I'll lower it to 120. I was thinking: although they could rip apart AT-ATs in small groups, would Penetration 10 be better than 20?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 30, 2009 16:04:25 GMT -5
Yeah, probably. The one in the Database is pretty close to your version, go see what we did there.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 30, 2009 16:07:35 GMT -5
Okay, I'll check it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 1, 2009 11:28:05 GMT -5
I see. Pretty low HP for a tank with armor that rivaled an AT-AT, more offensive potential but weaker defensively, and no Draw Fire. Also a custom 'Missles 30' (note the spelling error) that doesn't affect adjacent characters. It is interesting, but I think it's a bit overcosted, 35 would probably have been better.
Anyway, does this one look good for it's cost?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jul 3, 2009 12:46:30 GMT -5
Yes it does.
Lol, remember, that C-CAT is old, around a year and a half. We were still laboring under the delusions of a meta uncorrupted by SSM and Lobuck.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 3, 2009 13:25:43 GMT -5
Lol. Yeah, it's alright, but probably wouldn't be played with todays Mandos, where all of them have Twin and very good stats.
Anyway, these guys look good, for now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jul 3, 2009 17:31:30 GMT -5
Yeah, I think so.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 3, 2009 17:57:07 GMT -5
Okay, sounds good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jul 3, 2009 17:59:59 GMT -5
We seem to have gotten better at finishing Mandalorians. We finished both this thread and VwH's Mando thread in under 8 pages.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 3, 2009 18:06:32 GMT -5
Lol. And that one had what, 5 minis on it? Didn't the Mando thread in FotR take like 5 or 6 pages or something? We are getting better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jul 3, 2009 18:07:12 GMT -5
That one had 13 characters. Lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jul 3, 2009 18:26:06 GMT -5
That's true, but they were all from the database, so they shouldn't have taken 5 or 6 pages. Lol.
|
|
Man