|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 1, 2009 15:52:29 GMT -5
Yeah, that's right. Otherwise it would be better than Renewal because your enemy is also losing a FP.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 1, 2009 16:08:49 GMT -5
Yeah. Lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 1, 2009 16:32:37 GMT -5
Yeah. So other than that, I think she's good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 2, 2009 18:47:10 GMT -5
Me too. One more, and we're good. Maverick?
|
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Jun 5, 2009 10:52:09 GMT -5
Looks good. However, on Manipulation, what does she need sight to? An enemy? The character's she gets to choose to activate? That needs to be redefined, just for clarification purposes.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 5, 2009 11:03:09 GMT -5
Yeah, that's a good point, Roque. I don't really think it needs sight, just because it doesn't directly affect the "target" character at all, just your opponent. So I would suggest dropping the sight part of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 9, 2009 20:55:04 GMT -5
That's true. Should we just drop the sight clause?
|
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Jun 10, 2009 12:35:43 GMT -5
That would work much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Jun 10, 2009 12:36:06 GMT -5
Also, shouldn't this be Darth Traya, Sith Lord?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 13, 2009 21:50:24 GMT -5
Yeah, probably. That's more canonically correct.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 14, 2009 8:32:05 GMT -5
Yeah, she was never Kreia and a Sith at the same time (kind of like the Anakin/Vader thing). So are good to rename it to Darth Traya, Sith Lord?
|
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Jun 16, 2009 13:01:50 GMT -5
I think so, I'll edit it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Jun 16, 2009 13:03:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Jun 16, 2009 13:16:14 GMT -5
I think it is finished. She has my vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roque Saber on Jun 16, 2009 20:34:36 GMT -5
K, we've got 2 votes. Need one more.
|
|
Man
