|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Apr 10, 2009 16:26:02 GMT -5
That would be a lot of droids. I think Damage Reduction 10 sounds good, but I don't remeber if the generators had shields in the game or not. I don't think so, and Damage Reduction seems to be a better fit. A cost of about 25 sounds good, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 10, 2009 16:55:57 GMT -5
Damage Reduction would probably be better.
|
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Apr 10, 2009 23:21:25 GMT -5
I think the "replace destroyed" idea is interesting, but I'm not sure if it plays as well in the minis as it does in the video game. Assuming I can't come up with a new angle based on that, are you guys basically saying replace shields with DR10, cost it at about 25, and call it a day?
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Apr 11, 2009 8:37:09 GMT -5
The only thing I can think of that would work for the "replaced destroyed" idea would be this: (at the beginning of the skirmish, place one Star Forge Droid next to this character. If the SFD would be destroyed, you may immediately place another SFD adjacent to this character.). That could work but could be a major headache. Anybody else think of a better way, or does it not carry over well?
I think that replacing shields with DR 10 and moving cost to 25 would be good, if th replaced destroyed idea doesn't work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 11, 2009 11:30:40 GMT -5
I like the original idea a little better, personally.
And, yes, DR10 and cost at 25 is better.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Apr 11, 2009 11:32:50 GMT -5
I do too, there is a potential for more droids, and you don't need a half dozen generators to get a good army going.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 11, 2009 11:35:36 GMT -5
Right. Whereas the second idea is basically only a Reinforcements which doesn't rely on initiative.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Apr 11, 2009 11:38:40 GMT -5
Yeah. I just threw something out there. I don't really think the replaced destroyed idea could work, unless someone else can think of something.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 11, 2009 11:41:02 GMT -5
Nah. The game's complex enough as is, and why should we contribute to the whole wording mess?
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Apr 11, 2009 11:44:05 GMT -5
Yeah I agree. Have the suggested changes been made?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 11, 2009 12:49:22 GMT -5
No. I'll take care of it unless anyone else has anything to add.
|
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Apr 11, 2009 19:32:35 GMT -5
I made the changes to the initial post and will copy over to my section. Lock away when you're ready!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Apr 11, 2009 20:21:57 GMT -5
Okay, thanks, Gwek.
Locking now.
|
|
Man
