|
|
Post by gwek on Feb 7, 2009 11:49:16 GMT -5
Double works for me.
The commander effect could work, but:
CE that offers extra damage + Pawn of the Dark Side + FelCor = OUCH!
Although maybe the problem is with PotDS...
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Feb 7, 2009 13:43:08 GMT -5
That may be true.
|
|
|
|
Post by planeswalker459 on Feb 9, 2009 16:21:16 GMT -5
Could be.
While Pawn originally felt right on him, perhaps repalcing with another defensive force power might be more in character.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Feb 9, 2009 18:17:12 GMT -5
Like what? Would Lightsaber Deflect, or something like that work?
|
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Feb 9, 2009 21:34:49 GMT -5
I don't know, I still like the scheming, self-destructive theme we see with Tactics Broker and PotDS. Maybe we can come up with a more Machiavellian commander effect that's in keeping with his long-term plotting and scheming?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Feb 9, 2009 21:40:44 GMT -5
So you want to change the CE. Okay, any ideas?
|
|
|
|
Post by planeswalker459 on Feb 10, 2009 1:01:32 GMT -5
Machiavellian eh?
Hows about a Mon Mothma type CE? When pawn kills a figure off, they get one final strike?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Feb 10, 2009 18:33:20 GMT -5
Cool. That could work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on May 17, 2009 20:45:11 GMT -5
I still agree with the above post.
|
|
|
|
Post by generalgrevious on May 18, 2009 8:56:58 GMT -5
So heres your three points...
-Add a CE
-Give him Double
-Keep either Stealth or FSM
Here is my responce
I would say the commander effect Planeswalker gave him would be a little too weak for him in today's game. I would say give them cunning instead of just advantgous.
As for the last two I believe they need to go together as the same question.
If you give him Fire Support Mission you give him Triple.
If you give him Stealth give him Double.
I would personally say that FSM and Triple is more fitting.
As for the starting force I would say 4. As well as not adding Eternal Hatred
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on May 18, 2009 15:50:28 GMT -5
Good assessment, GG. That all looks okay to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by gwek on Jun 1, 2009 22:06:02 GMT -5
So... Wait. Which version are we looking at?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Jun 2, 2009 18:46:34 GMT -5
Planeswalker's, I believe. Look at reply number 9.
|
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Nov 8, 2009 16:15:12 GMT -5
Where do we stand with this piece? Can someone update the OP? Looking at the OP, I think he needs more HP, 80 seems far too low for 66 points. At least 100 would be better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Nov 14, 2009 17:56:38 GMT -5
Probably, but he could just be recosted.
|
|
Man
