|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 21, 2009 14:16:01 GMT -5
Yeah, it is. I also like the save of 11 to attack, that fits too.
Instead of Diplomat, we could make it like Diplomat, except make it like this:
If an attacker has line of sight to any enemies without Form 0, this character is not a legal target and does not count as the nearest enemy, even if adjacent
Basically the same thing. Which is better?
|
|
|
Post by darthblond on Aug 21, 2009 22:03:00 GMT -5
Well it is the Diplomat form so I would be fine with just leaving it as this character counts as having Diplomat but the change does seem like a good idea.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Aug 22, 2009 13:51:18 GMT -5
Yeah, there's just one problem that I find with that wording: if the character "counts" as having Diplomat, do they gain the benefits of it or do they just count as a Diplomat for the purposes of others with Diplomat?
I'm probably confusing you, but I don't think there are any WotC special abilities that involve giving a SA as part of a SA. I might still be confusing you, so here is what I suggest we do:
a) give him Form 0 (this character must make a save of 11 to attack) and Diplomat.
b) give him the Form 0 I mentioned above (plus the save to attack).
Using one SA to give the character another SA seems...odd to me. Why not just drop that part and put Diplomat on those with Form 0?
|
|
|
Post by darthblond on Aug 22, 2009 17:08:12 GMT -5
That makes sense I like the b because then there is no way some one could end up with form 0 and not be a "diplomat"
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Aug 23, 2009 16:43:18 GMT -5
Bountyhunter is correct. We should modify the ability to read as listed above.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Sept 18, 2009 20:40:52 GMT -5
Oh yeah, we now have a WotC Shii-Cho Style, seen in the checklist and rules download. Here is the glossary definition: Shii-Cho Style: This character has a +4 bonus to both Attack and Defense while 3 or more enemies are within 6 squares of it. May not be the exact wording the card will have (we'll have to wait and see for that), because it is the glossary definition. This is probably one of the best lightsaber styles in SWM - right up there with Djem So and Soresu. Anybody have any guesses on what Shii-Cho Style Mastery will look like?
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 7, 2009 22:07:51 GMT -5
Huh. Odd. This powercreep is speeding up even more than before. I hope that one's Mastery, and Style looks like +2 to both Attack and Defense.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 8, 2009 14:35:08 GMT -5
There are pictures of Kit's card, and I am pretty certain that his +4/+4 is the normal version. Mastery might give them a SA, maybe Evade or something, if the conditions are met (in addition to the +4/+4 - think Ataru Mastery!)
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 8, 2009 15:24:40 GMT -5
Oh, nice. That won't unbalance the game, or anything.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 8, 2009 15:32:15 GMT -5
Yeah. Too bad this Kit just costs too much and relies on Shii-Cho Style to be of any use (NO character costing 60 points should rely on one SA...).
|
|
|
Post by generalgrevious on Oct 15, 2009 11:05:09 GMT -5
Updated with Shii-Cho style.
WE WERE REALLY CLOSE ON THAT ONE! LOL
Nice job guys!
Our mastery was their normal +1 enemy within 6.
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 16, 2009 12:45:54 GMT -5
Huh. I'm still convinced someone's a WotC spy. Probably Bountyhunter9.
Lol. Jk.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunter9 on Oct 16, 2009 15:58:08 GMT -5
Wow we were close. Too bad i'm not a WotC spy...then I might have some say in getting more Sith pieces!
|
|
|
Post by Jm419 on Oct 16, 2009 21:37:17 GMT -5
Or decent OR...but that's another thread.
It's interesting how close we are to WotC. We must be better customizers than we thought.
|
|
|
Post by Dendrite on Mar 11, 2010 21:59:20 GMT -5
Should Trispzest Style be included as something like this?
Trispzest Style (+2 Attack and +2 Defense against adjacent enemies without Flight)
|
|